Softdesk® Auto-Architect®
Architectural Software for AutoCAD®
Comments by: Odin Cary
9/20/97
Review
This program continues to perplex and surprise
me. In the past, I found that it suffered from poor design, poor integration with
AutoCAD® and massive code, yet it appears that this program continues to be a popular 3rd
Party add-on for Architects. Just prior to Softdesk's acquisition by Autodesk® I was
asked by a client to install and configure Softdesk® 8.0.
Auto-Architect; installation:
On the second attempt, the CD installation of
Softdesk's Auto-Architect was rather simple and problem free. What was not obvious to me
on my first attempt, was that I had to request a "custom" installation to set it
up for my client's network configuration; under the "custom" installation, the
network pathing was self-explanatory. I launched Auto-Architect 8.0 from the automatically
created desktop icon and found that it loaded without a hitch and I was pleasantly
surprised to see that instead of replacing or restructuring the native AutoCAD menu
layout, the Auto-Architect menu items have simply been added to the familiar layout. Once
I saved the default drawing with a name, I managed to test the features of Auto-Architect;
everything seemed to work quite well.
Auto-Architect; customizing for a small office
network:
Knowing that this program covers a vast spectrum of
architectural needs, I immediately attempted to customize its default settings for a more
streamlined implementation. My client works primarily on residential projects which are
basically identical with respect to layers, annotation styles, dimension styles, symbols
and so forth. Since Auto-Architect was designed to manage projects as individual islands
of information I was not able to configure it to store the plethora of folders and files
it creates for each project, in one folder and then refer to it for all similar projects.
What I had to do, was configure it so that it saw all of my client's projects as part of
the same Auto-Architect Project.
Auto-Architect; layers:
Auto-Architect provides a rather simple and easy to
comprehend interface for customizing most of its standard settings like layers and text.
What I soon discovered upon testing my layer and annotation customization, was that
Auto-Architect doesn't appear to follow its own rules. For example, I attempted to set the
Auto-Architect layers to allow my client to turn off text within symbols while maintaining
the symbols so that information could be manually written within the symbols on the
printed sheets as it became known and then input later, but though Auto-Architect has a
layer for symbol text and though it creates this layer when you insert a symbol, the
attribute information is actually inserted on the same layer as the symbol itself. Another
example of irritating design decisions, is that layers are automatically created by object
association rather than user desire; i.e., with the first construction of walls, comes a
layer for text.
Auto-Architect; door and window symbols:
If the user manages to maintain walls in the native
Auto-Architect form, inserting doors and windows is not only effortless but quite
intuitive. It offers two types of door and window routines: one for simple block insertion
without symbol and 3D support and another for totally customizable detail which can later
or simultaneously be manipulated as 3D objects. My client will primarily be using what
Auto-Architect calls "Quick Doors and Windows"; these are basically simple
blocks without attributes. By default, the doors require three layers, one for the door,
one for the door-swing and one for the insertion reference layer. Since I cannot change
the innate structure of the program, I had to set its insertion layer for all such items
to layer 0 in order to prevent it from creating reference layers. This could have been
remedied by creating a symbol on layer 0 to begin with, create a symbol layer prior to
insertion, and then insert that symbol on its own newly created layer. Okay, maybe the
concept was to allow the user to freeze both doors and windows by selecting one insertion
layer, but that is something simple layer management could do without excess layers; i.e.,
a user should be able to ask for all openings to be turned off.